( )-written by D.Cambiaso-


Why is G4s a client/associate of CRISISCAST.COM who claims: 

“Award winning role play actors and film makers specially trained in disaster and crisis management.”

“We dramatise events for emerging security needs in the UK, Middle East and worldwide. Our specialist role play actors – many with security clearance – are trained by behavioural psychologists and rigorously rehearsed in criminal and victim behaviour to help police, the army and the emergency services, hospitals, schools, local authorities, government, private security firms, shopping centres, airports, big business, criminal justice departments, media and the military to simulate incident environments for life saving procedures.” 


“We use state of the art British film industry techniques, props and special effects to help trainers deliver essential, hands-on, high octane crisis response and disaster management training. We also work with trainee doctors, psychologists and care professionals.”


In the videos below, the concensus among many and a broad spectrum of citizens response in the comment sections of the videos, are leading people to believe that this is fake crying from apparent fake interviewees or actors trying to be passed off as the real deal by mainstream media.  This suspicion comes from the fact that there are hardly any or no tears, no watery eyes, no red eyes, no flushed or red face, no mucus or increase of fluids from the nose or mouth. Others liken it to watching a horrible c movie actor trying to weep their weepiest moment in a sad scene but miserably fails and the entire theatre mutually knows it. 

In the video below is a mother who’s son apparently died at the Orlando night club. Is she his mother? From the way she acts you wouldn’t be able to tell. One person writes,  “I would be dying and crying nonstop if that was my son, how can this mother who’s son just died horrifically, read his texts so calmly?” A great point and hits home, both logically and emtionally when thought about. I can’t imagine myself or anyone I know acting so calmly if in the same shoes or situation. We must ask ourself or rather the question, is this really the normal behaviour of someone who has just gone through what she has? Some will say it’s shock, but I’m not buying that bridge in Brooklyn.


In another video below, we can see a couple of individuals carrying an injured individual (left or right leg) down a side walk were you see them stop and allow the individual to stand and immedietly they start to smirk, laugh and act like they are having the times of their lives. Interesting enough, every time the mainstream media plays the same clip described and shown below, they always make sure they cut out the individual standing up, the others laughing and smirking. Not a hard editing job and the impact on one’s perception is easily persuaded or rather manifested.


We know the elite are trying to start a race war, verbally or physically, especially with the white and black community. Doesn’t it seem all to perfect that a black survivor tells the story of what the terrorist told her; “Are there any black people in here? I don’t want to kill black people because you have suffered enough.” First off he wasn’t a blind terrorist, he wore glasses and would be able to look around instead of having to ask that. Suffered at the hands of who exactly? (Implying just white people deserve to die, which fuels the race war/ divide and conquer rhetoric?) Then he apparently shot a white gay male next to her. This reeks of a classic divide and conquer/race war rhetoric, script, and tactics hidden behind or masked by extreme human emotion and social norms of not questioning such a horrifying act even if and when inconsistencies or fallacies show up.

But wait, wasn’t he acting this way because of his religion and the way they view gays? Is he not suppose to kill all gays regardless of their color, regardless of past or present oppressions? Since when did terrorist or jihad become sympathetic to African American oppressions or any American oppression to begin with? Why would he stop his reign of terror based on color, why would he decide to become political during the middle of his jihad? But wait, there’s more, the terrorist insisted he wouldn’t stop his assault until “America had stopped bombing his country”. So which is it? Being black, gay and American is acceptable in the eyes of jihad, even when being gay and American are arguably the top two things jihad calls for and the top two things they kill for without question. So somehow the black, gay, American  community gets a pass, even though they are Americans who are bombing his country, which he is their to kill exactly for as well. Does any of this make any sense or seem logical? Now, there are going to be people who say this article is racist, simply because we are using the words gay and black. There will even be people and artciles who try to twist this story or the words in it and say that this rhetoric symbolizes someone who hates the black gay community. What we are attempting to do here is break down the psychological fallacies in the story and inconsistencies. Don’t blow this out of proportion.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: